Nintendo isn't in a bad place right now. The Wii U hasn't sold very well, but they're still fine. The 3DS has made them a lot of money. What does Alison Rapp have to do with anything? I also don't know what Nintendo making their games more accessible has to do with them making less money. Do you think that the next Zelda won't sell if they include a female option as opposed to if they don't? You base that on what exactly?
I meant in terms of PR. They've kind of been coming under a lot of fire given the translations I mentioned from the pro-gamergate side and the anti-gamergate side for firing Rapp. That's another discussion though. Never said the new Zelda wouldn't sell. I just said I'd have a problem with it if too much focus was put on the alternate protagonist.
Also, don't tell me I'm not allowed to react to your opinions. This is a forum. That's what a forum is all about. I'm also fine with Link being a guy, but if I'm given an option I'd be happier playing as a girl.
You're allowed to react to my opinions. Just don't yell at me please. It hurts my feelings. ;_;
Also, I play as girls in most games that allow the option - again - so long as it doesn't influence the story or gameplay overtly. Both my Dark Souls charas are female, my WoW and FFXIV mains are female, and I'm playing two females in the RPs (who are quite possibly better characterized than my male lmao). So it's definitely not an aversion to playing female characters on my part.
I doubt the playstyle would be different, but I wouldn't mind it either because that would sound interesting.
That's the kind of thing I'm talking about yeah. Now if it was just cosmetic (IE Linkle using a crossbow while Link uses a bow, with no other real adjustments to gameplay) then it'd be fine. If they played drastically differently, it'd be
interesting I suppose but I really wouldn't want to put double the hours in a game when I've got a life on top of it and other stuff waiting to be played.