Red Dead Redemption.
I will be purchasing this and I wanna know all the bad thing from the so called perfect western game.
Sure.
- Damn you Horseshoe minigame, why you gotta be so frustrating?
- Multiplayer modes could have so much impact, but you can't play Poker online, or Blackjack, or do [parasitic bomb] like awesome co-op bank robbing events unless you just pick free play and mess around. (it could have been PERFECT PERFECT).
- Soundtrack is excellent, but not enough spaghetti western funkyness.
- Hunting and gathering challenges. I found out I had to kill 5 birds when I found out birds could be killed. After having killed an entire ecosystem of wildlife around the world. And that ecosystem didn't count a single point towards the challenge because I hadn't killed those damn birds yet. >_>
- ...did that kidnapped maiden just die BECAUSE I TOOK ONE MORE SECOND TO SHOOT YOU IN THE HEAD? AND NOW IT'S SAVED IN THE MAIN STORYLINE? GOD DAMMIT REALISM.
- What do you mean I can't camp and save anywhere near settlements? I know it's ridiculous if I set up a camp right in the middle of town, but as I see nowhere I can sleep in around here, it'd ridiculous to run 100 more meters in that direction where IT'S WILDERNESS ENOUGH for me to camp and save my game.
- Where the hell is my next bounty? I had so much fun with my last one. Damn hard-to-look-for Wanted posters.
Anything else, I haven't even explored 10% of the game, and I've clocked in tens of hours in it. So far, it's got so much stuff, it's friggin' perfect. Yes, it is the "Perfect Western Game" indeed. You know that notion of "You can do anything!" in hype for Fable games? They nailed it in this game, in my opinion. No marriage or kids, but you can pretty much do anything there is to be done in a fictional wild west setting. My favorite thing to do is to stand on top of a train with a friend, on opposite sides, and race towards the middle, all while shooting each other with loose aim. =P
(Gimme some time, I'll work on getting the other games done on this post)
Hey, have you ever played...
Rayman 3?
If not, then maybe you played Mario & Luigi(the first one)?
IMMA AWAITIN YOUR REPLY!
Alright, Rayman it is.
- YAY POWERUP. Wait... it lost its effect in like 3 seconds. >_> Why make me more powerful if I can only use this power in puzzles?
- AM I GRINDING THROUGH RAINBOW DIMENSIONS FOR LEVEL TRANSITIONS WHAT THE HELL
- "Livid" Dead, huh? God dammit I wanted some zombies. ;_;
- Bit linear and tight compared to the previous outings.
- Camera issues.
- Okay, so the first game and second game were absolute incredible revolutions of gameplay and action unlike anything we've seen before. What does this one bring to the table that's new and innovative? >_>
I don't think any game is truly flawless, but I'm going to post one anyway.
No More Heroes. There's an easy one.
Alright.
- Repetitive gameplay.
- FUN JOBS GIVE LITTLE MONEY, UNFUN JOBS GIVE BIG BUCKS
- All wrestling moves look pretty much the same.
- Letz Shake = Cop-out. I was promised ten ranking bosses dammit. >_>
- Most fights can be beaten by dodging and mashing A, dodging and mashing A. Why do you even need the wrestling moves?
- Easy peasy.
Nah, pick the one you can say the most about 
Gunstar Super/Future Heroes it is.
- Remake? Sequel? Why make it anyway?
- Not just worse than the Godly first one, but there's pretty much no comparison.
- Character redesigns suck massive big monkey bawls.
- 3 choices of weapon ain't no substitute for the awesome combinations we used to have!
- Stop sucking so much, schmup helicopter section! You were made by the Ikaruga people, why do you suck so much?
- MINE LEVEL YOU CAN FLY IN THE MIDDLE THAT AIN'T NO WAY TO REMAKE THE BEST BOSS BATTLE OF ALL TIME
GOD DAMMIT WHY WAS THIS GAME NECESSARY. Remakes aren't meant to be worse than the original. >_> AND IS IT A SEQUEL OR A REMAKE
Okay, all done. Bring me more games, or give me some feedback.