Generally, no. I don't believe in violence for its own sake. I will only fight back if I or a person close to me is threatened and there's no means of escape or negotiation, and even then I'll try to solve the fight as quickly and easily as possible. Only if I'm extremely provoked will I engage in confrontation; I almost choked a person for physically harassing me, though it wasn't out of blind anger - it was more a "touch me again and I will ensure terrible things befall you" deal. He didn't bother me after that.
A technical pacifist is one who does not approve or killing or shedding blood. Making the other person suffer in other ways or subduing them in non-violent ways, however viscious or unusual they might be, is fair game. I prefer manipulating people into screwing themselves over - that way I don't have to engage in thuggish violence and I can watch them bring about their own downfall with a knowing, innocent smile. It's also a lot more fun.
I like your style. Blackmail, reverse psychology and manipulation are awesome ways to tear apart somebody without having to get close to them. Plus, it's hella fun.
But violence for its own sake is also fun. Heck, I got a few awesome friends who I regularly engage in tussles with. If you've never been in a good fight, you've never lived before. But what I love the most, is just beating up bad people.
See, you got these dudes who you KNOW deserve to get punched in the face, kicked in the groin, and otherwise be done awful acts to their general fisionomy so their faces don't resemble the ones they've walked in with when you're done with him. So you can let loose with them. Be creative. Forget all your morals and have FUN tearing a second [dark hold] into that dude. Grab a random heavy object like a glass bottle and DESTROY the [tornado fang]ing thing in their faces. Go for the eyes, the weak parts, parts you know they'll get hurt in, as long as it's nothing permanent.
And the best part? You never feel bad, because you KNOW that they deserved it.