So my friend and I were discussing about the Spidey trilogy today. Not really sure how our conversation transitioned to Spider-man, probably because we were talking about how we wanted a "movie-quality" super hero TV show. Anyway, he claims to have enjoyed Spider-man 3 over Spider-man 2. But like most people have said, 3 was the worst in the trilogy. After a few minutes of talking, he agreed that "maybe" Venom weakened the quality of the movie, but loved how he came into the scene for the first time.
Arguing back and forth, I just finally said that the only
good part about the movie was Sandman's birth. Granted, him falling down into the middle of the construction site was lame. But his origin really showed that he wasn't "just another terrible crook", but like everyone else who just happened to have bad luck. Being divorced and not being able to see his son again.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txnf4s7eWs0&feature=related[/youtube]
Both the music and animation for this scene were amazing, but after this point in the movie, it straight-out fell flat. I know this is an old movie, thus an old topic, but that argument made me want to vent again on how much potential the movie had. I would actually say the entire beginning of the movie was good, later ruined by TERRIBLE dialog and story telling that did not do the previous 2 masterpieces justice. Venom's rush-job in the movie sealed the coffin, and I was already tempted to walk out of the movie theater when
Peter was doing that stupid dance. After like 15 minutes of talking, we just dropped the subject. I really don't know if he decided to agree with me or not, he just shrugged it off. Anyway, just wanted to post that here. Also curious if anyone here thinks that the movie had the potential to be the best in the series if not for atrocious pacing and dialog. I think having Sandman and Venom in the same movie doesn't sound so bad on paper, if Raimi hadn't created 3 with an IQ level under 10.