I keep skeptical until the system is proven worthwhile to me. Example: The DSi is still not worth it.
I want to argue with that but it's very hard to. Only reason I have a DSi is because my original phat cracked its top screen. Yeah, it's shinier, the options are far superior, and it is TECHNICALLY a superior system from a CPU/RAM standpoint, but it really is being treated as just another DS. The online store is crap and the extra horsepower hasn't yet yielded anything noticeable besides a slightly less horrendous web browser.
Also no more remakes. Just all virtual console support on the handheld and done.
Considering what we got in SM64 DS I have to very strenuously disagree with that one. Besides the fact that Bowser's sub refuses to reappear, the entire thing is infinitely superior to SM64. However there is the question of what first-party N64 candidates one would want to see get such treatment. Let's be honest, the next most demanded titles after SM64 would be Zelda, which already saw Master Quest, and Smash, which should be given an actual new entry (MEWTWO!).
For reasons nobody knows, Nintendo doesn't seem too keen on a portable Virtual Console. Even if they did it would probably only emulate other handhelds. They're not willing to transfer ownership of Wii-downloaded VC titles (hence the inability to play them at a friend's or anything), so anything beyond that would be competing with themselves.
Also on DeviantArt, Rumble, DLive.tv, and the Fediverse (@freespeechextremist.com and @bae.st)