Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I actually liked Black Knight... Secret Rings, I just can't enjoy.I have to admit that Black Knight did strike my interest. It definitely looks unique and fun. I don't mind those kind of oddball games, so long as they're fun and not annoying to play. I'm looking at you, Sonic 3D Blast.
You have to admit, SA2 was enjoyable.I do admit it and agree. Sonic Adventure 2 was the last good Sonic game I've played. I haven't gotten a chance to play Sonic Unleashed, Secret Rings, Black Knight, or Sonic the Hedgehog, though. From what I've seen and read, though, the controls are beyond broken in Sonic the Hedgehog.
in Secret Rings, Sonic only moves forward with the camera locked behind him. you hold the Wiimote NES style and tilt it left or right to make Sonic shift over to that side. to back up, you have to turn the Wiimote up towards you, which the game doesn't read very well at all.Yeah, I looked up some screenies. It looks like an interesting game. I never usually go backward in the 3D Sonic games, anyway. Maybe it's a Wii title I'll have to check out.
i enjoyed Secret Rings very much, but it's not a game i'm going to play any more. i'll stick with S3K, thank you very much.
Yes please on S3K too. ^^Only because discs weren't good to the Blue Blur. Discs don't read fast enough to keep up to Sonic's speed. Sonic Team admitted they needed to drastically slow Sonic down from Sonic Adventure on.
Sonic was soo 90's, sweetie.
*put 80's games in here, including Super Mario Bros.*Why? Was Secret Rings a side-scroller? You could move backwards in every other side-scroller Sonic game.
Nothing really, besides the controls.Well, it is a Wii game. I kinda figured it would be the controls.
DS, Wii. Nintendo has been fine for me, the games I have are great. (Except for Secret Rings, that pile of [parasitic bomb].)What's wrong with Secret Rings? I haven't played it myself.
all of themHurry it up, PB!
as soon as that damned package from PB gets here.
I have my......... S.......SNESWell, if there was any console to get stuck with, the SNES is probably the one most people would pick. It's still awesome even today.
Dr Light.He did start it by creating these robots of mass destruction to begin with, but he isn't completely to blame. I think Dr. Cain was the one who screwed up the world.
My friend has literally told both Lou and myself that he's so disgusted withe the 360's failure rate, before it was 54%, that he wouldn't even take a free one, and that if someone got it for him, he'd literally sell it and use that money for more games. Honestly, I don't blame him. That amount of failures is really unacceptable, for any piece of hardware. Which is a shame too, because I do like my 360.I'll probably end up buying a used one. I bought my PS2 off my brother for $50.
As for the PS3, I agree with Acid. I doubt the price of it will ever be lower.
This is correct. It's really bad business when something like this gets away without more public spectacle. The generally accepted failure rate for most electronic products is something like 3 - 8% or so after all IIRC.360: 54%
I think this is the lowest low the PS3 price will ever reach. So if you really want one you got to save yourself some money. No way around that.It's Microsoft, so no, it won't be more reliable. If anything, it'll be worse than the current XBox.
As for the Xbox: If Microsoft's next console will have the same problems again, even if just for a small amount of time, I'd leave the ship. It would prove that they learned nothing or just don't care. Console wars (I hate them) aside, 33% failure rate is absolutely and indisputably too high for this day and age. For any product out there, I'm not just talking about consoles. You can't possibly defend that, or try to talk it down. So let's hope the neXtbox will be more reliable.
33%? Last I heard, it was at 54% Failure Rate.That's what I heard too.
except i've had my 360 for years and still haven't red ringed.It's statistics, dear. It doesn't mean it will happen, it just means there's a high probability that it could.
the Jasper units don't RRoD. and if they aren't the default model by now, M$ is [tornado fang]ing retarded.What's a Jasper?
Ventilation motherfuckers, make sure it gets enough of it!I think that's a veiled "if doesn't work for you, you're doing it wrong" statement. That's what Microsoft said about Vista and they were wrong. That's also what they say about the 360--and guess what?--they're wrong. The 360 is the one console that needs a re-design. The current one is flawed. The failure rates for the PS3 and the Wii aren't even in the double digits.
Resetting ends the progress of world evolution.Resetting is bad for both. Lumine went insane, right? That "I'm going to kill myself and take as many with me as a I can" mentality. Which in his case, meant the entire universe. In the case of the planet all this crap happens, though, I'm sure it wouldn't mind being put out of its misery. All of those crazy robots blowing stuff up, crashing satellites into it, and creating weird things like robotic plants. And this huge, never-ending war ends up in a global flood, right?
A new world can be made from that point, with different visions than the last one.
From who's point of view do YOU think it's a bad thing? For the hunters or for Lumine?
Not just the stage. The whole world is reset~Considering how screwed up the Rockman universe is, I fail to see how resetting it would be a bad thing.
