From the very beginning, we've said that the "US-continuity" is inconsistent with itself. You argued: Inconsistencies do not make it any less of a continuity. But at the same time you say that the US-exclusive info being inconsistent with the Japanese-exclusive info demands two continuities.
I think your stance is what's inconsistent here; if inconsistencies do not destroy continuity, then all is one continuity regardless of inconsistencies.
My argument was, just because US continuity is an internal mess doesn't mean it can't stand on its own, separate from the JP continuity.
In the view that there is but one continuity, what is noted are the inconsistencies. Inconsistencies do not require the creating of a continuity of its own.
A few, maybe it could be left alone. A lot, like the case is with Classic MM, and trying to say that both regional versions are wholly the same doesn't really work.
This is why I don't really agree with the label of "continuity" to replace "canon"
It doesn't. Canon encompasses continuity; it's not replaced by it.
Maybe Gonzo wants to talk about an "Aile continuity" and "Vent continuity"
Those are timeline splits. >.> And no, I don't. I've about had enough of this conversation.