Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hm. That pain in my left kidney seems to have subsided a bit. I don't notice it as much now.ooh boy. kidney pain is always fun.
Too big even for Disney. Besides, gotta keep the Mickey/Bugs rivalry intact!
I'd make the arguement of why Namco doesn't suck due to the Tales games and God Eater Burst, among other things, but that's my opinion that it doesn't suck and your opinion that it does.I had plans for one that tied into the Clock Genius incident detailed in the added scenario of OSS, complete with bosses. Don't know how good it would be if it was official though.
Also I loved NT Warrior but the Star Force anime did suck.
Anyway I would like another Megaman RPG like Battle Network or Starforce but it'd be very hard to get right. I also would like a Starforce 4, but I don't know what they can do with it in terms of plot.
Why mei guess this is an unwelcome change then
Only for like 3 turns, which for true winners (read: procrastinators) happens very suddenlyThe fact remains you can save them.
You're full of [parasitic bomb]. Koei's Gemfire uses flanking and rear assaults, and that game deals with armies, except in the case of special units.To be fair, it is one-on-one combat (or in this, two-on-one), and if you only have a single foe coming at you in armor (which makes noise) you tend to hear them in time to react accordingly. Also, you're moving one troop at a time. The concept of flanking, which requires multiple troops to move at once, is somewhat irrelevant to the gameplay when you're only moving one character at a time.
And what about any military strategy ever? Tywin Lannister is all like "Aggravate their flanks, but do not engage them" and Jaime Lannister gets captured from a rear and flanking assault. Also horses trump footmen.
Well with the name and advertisement can you blame them, it looks interesting though.I still fail to see how it sounds like a gay porn.
[tornado fang] those people and [tornado fang] those gay unwatchable animes for five year-oldsThe anime's actually pretty damn good.
[tornado fang] yes
But smoother IE: made by a real game company IE: Capcom
Who is Patch? Is that the mook in the wheelchair?
Fire Emblem has a variety of options in terms of how quickly you want the gameplay to go (movement speed, attack animations, and such). I find the general pacing to be slow, but that's because I think a lot, and generally don't play a lot of strategy games, so yeah.That FE12 translation patch is nearin' completion, btw.
For the record, I agree with Zomirby; Shadow Dragon was pretty horrid compared to Path of Radiance/Radiant Dawn. Despite the shiny visuals it's still evident, from a story/narrative standpoint, that it is based off of an NES game (further most of its new content is a reward for deliberately sucking at the game). Nevertheless I was still hoping that FE12 would make it here, as it looked to have improved on many of those weaknesses, but it seems Nintendo fell to the "if the franchise stumbles just let it die" mentality during that timeframe. I guess that's what we call hacking-bait, eh?
I never saw it as odd in Fire Emblem because the combat takes place among individual soldiers, and a single human being (and I assume dragon/cat/whatever) can turn around very easily. Flanking is something that affects the group, not the individual.
So while there is no "directional" modifiers for the individual battles, formation in terms of your team in general is of course very relevant. You can get "flanked" in the sense that a unit at the edge of your line is vulnerable from more angles, therefore is liable to take more attacks in a single turn and die. This is something you need to be conscientious of throughout the Fire Emblem games, and ESPECIALLY Radiant Dawn. There's a lot of emphasis on terrain as well, including Radiant Dawn offering bonuses for elevation (IE; attacking someone from atop a ledge).
