Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp9qT_h1TRY&feature=related[/youtube]Halfway justified, but still out of character.
Skip to 1:48 in this vid
Wait, so officially pairing Sora with Kairi wouldn't count as "pandering to the het fans"?I won't say anything of this "official" until we see them kiss or some crap. And until Sora stops blubbering over Riku every time he's able to.
because Anti-Venom's ability to strip Spidey of his powers when at close range, which makes anti-venom deadly for spidey to fight....but he's a good guy. That's the whole point of Anti-Venom.
Also the 2nd Ultimate Spider-man (Miles Morales) costume was shown on a screenshot i saw on youtube and they will probably release a trailer for it soon.
Anti-VenomInsert big WHY here.
Well in terms of the prequels, the overuse of CG is just one of the many, many problems the films had. If the story was better, if the writing was better, if the characters were better, if the editing was better, if it was shot better, and so on, then the overuse of CG would probably not have been as big of a deal as it was.Sin City was another movie in which almost everything was CG. But as it was meant not to look real, it complemented it.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes has a lot of CG, but it's still a very good movie.
You know, that has me thinking.What could be logical would be that Xehanort's the one who harvested their heartless, turning them all into nobodies. Throughout KH1 they just wandered until they were found and formed the Organization (due to Xemnas being a different person, and probably hating Xehanort for the fact that he doesn't have a heart, he was accepted as a leader). Sora killed Xehanort, Xemnas and the others didn't focus on taking revenge, but regaining a heart instead.
As revealed in 358/2 Days, Roxas, when first born as a Nobody, was like a baby. He didn't know who he was or what to do; as such, he was very impressionable. So impressionable, in fact, that he was easily recruited into Organization XIII with little effort.
Now, what I'm thinking is, all Nobodies when first born, especially those who retain human form, are just like Roxas was. So it would be very little effort on Xehanort's part to convince them of what happened. In fact, even if they retained their memories, he could brush it off. And, maybe, they don't remember the instances of their demise that led them to a "life" as a Nobody. So that could easily be a part of it.
CG can be a great tool, when it's done properly. A great example of this is in The Two Towers, when Theoden is freed from Sarumon's control. That transition was beautiful.Yeah, but the LOTR movies are naturally FILLED with amazingly-built sceneries. WETA must've worked for years and years in order to achieve that. Some of the Minas Tirith streets were built by hand and took quite alot of time for just seconds of footage. It's not weird for CG to look good in a movie which doesn't overuse it.
It was a big rock!Not to mention the two-camera system. The same thing they use essencially for sitcoms and soap operas. As low-quality as ever goes the imagination.
Each movie is about 80-90 minutes of analysis each. If you don't have the time, essentially in the third movie's review he talks about the way it's presented. All the talking scenes are the same exact thing in every movie: sitting in a chair, walking in a hallway, standing next to a window, sitting down, walking, sitting, standing, shot/reverse shot over and over again, and your brain picks up on this. It's the most basic and boring of film making.
OK! Who knows how to remove gluttonous special effects hungry neck parasites?
I finally got around to reading that Superman batman Annual No. 4, the Batman Beyond one....read the Superman Beyond #0 One-Shot.
I liked it. Was nice above all to return to Beyond era Superman. And I like how the villain was Lex Luthor, now an old man in a hoverchair. I mean, I suppose one DID sort of wonder what he was up to in that era, being an old man himself.
The fact that the colors on his chair were green and purple was a cute nod to his armors too.
The way Superman's characher became is interesting to read too. Hes a sad man, no Lois, and now that Luthor is peddling kryptonite laced drugs, he cant clean up Metropolis anymore, and instead simply resorted to indiscriminately sending criminals to the phantom zone.
When it was revealed, what instantly came to mind was JLU, when Superman Sent Doomsday to the Phantom Zone and got chewed out by Bruce for doing so, comparing him to Justice Lord Superman, playing Judge Jury and Executioner. (lampshaded by Terry commenting the same thing)
Supes deciding to leave and see the galaxy is fine, but his reasoning seems a bit, I dunno. weird. he wants to see the universe before he dies, because "Noones immortal" or something, but well, yeah, he isnt, but he still ages slowly, looking middle aged when hes probably in his late 80's by then. It would SEEM more like he wants to clear his head and meditate, ponder on his life and such, but he should have just SAID that.
Also, it seems weird that he went to the trouble of getting rid of criminals with the projector and using Terry to get to Luthor, being sad that he cant clean up the city, but once Luthor is gone and he is free to do so again... he doesnt.
I also now have even LESS idea what the hell the plates on his suit are for now.
I used to think that maybe since he was aged, the suit being black and all, it was designed to absorb sunlight better, and that maybe the plates were related to that- but now it seems they are pockets. :B I have no idea how [parasitic bomb] fits in them either. They are pretty flat.
In the end, only complaint is I wish it was longer.
Pretty common knowledge on this side of the world.Thing is, if companies like Nintendo, behemoths of the business, started trying to make money out of new, more artistic, head-turning, clever games, things never tried before, that would help our business alot. Games like L.A. Noir get the attention of the media that we're trying to keep up with the Joneses, but you won't catch anyone other than nostalgia lovers with the old game cash-ins. There's a reason games like GTA appear on the news. They're controversial, just as much as movies were back then. With games, you can do so much more with interactivity, and that's what makes the general public so concerned, and the people in general so curious about these things.
There are plenty of reasons that gaming as art is not taken seriously, but I don't think sequels have that much to do with it. Movies are regarded as art and they suffer the same criticism. The challenge is that a lot of outsiders just don't see past the technology. They don't see the lasting value of a 20-25 year old classic game (even though Nintendo cashes in on them on a regular basis) and they believe that all games are destined to be rendered inferior to their follow-ups.
