1326
Off The Wall / Re: Post a Random Fact About Yourself
« on: September 14, 2010, 10:36:53 PM »
Big breasts are more of a man asset. Sadly, women have to carry it around with them. But they belong to us.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I still don't see the difference. The only thing separating the Zelda Collector's Edition from this Mario Collection re-dux is the means that had to be done to acquire it.The difference being that one never really required money as a DIRECT means and was still a bonus for all purposes, had four games that were never packed in together, two of them being from the last generation of consoles, which is quite different from what is technically, and for all intents and purposes, a WII PORT OF A SINGLE. SNES. GAME.
But whether you got the Zelda one as a pack-in with a GC, renewing a subscription to your region's Nintendo magazine, or sending in proofs of purchase from select GC games, you STILL had to provide Nintendo with some matter of money to get at the goods. Just like what you have to do for the sake of this Mario Collection. Arguably more, considering the cheapest option was often the Nintendo magazine subscription at some 20 clams (+tax).
So, what's it gonna be? 4 Games (which you played years and years ago) that you get on a disc as part of a "Rewards Program" that requires you to spend some matter of money any way to get access to it? Or 4 games (which you played years and years ago) that you get on a disc for a flat, fairly budgeted price range at retail? Choice is yours, but again, they all boil down to doing a lot to being the same thing.
Well, with all due respect, what was to be expected for like 2500 JPY as the asking price? This is basically as much in the way of a "budget pack cash in" as the Zelda Collector's disc for GC years ago, with the only real difference being that (at least for the JP side), you can't opt to just send in points/proof of purchase to redeem for the package deal; you actually have to pay out of pocket this time.A pack-in with TWO N64 games which basically can't be played right anywhere else since emulation for Majora's Mask is a nightmare (Back then, the thing crashed pretty much on every single day passing, and playing that with a keyboard's insanity. It's not just a two or three-button controller) is very different from a stand-alone game you have to PAY for. Nintendo intended the last one as a bonus. This? This is something that was already available as a game years and years ago. And they're selling it again, no changes.
To me, the only sad thing is that this isn't the "+World" package, and apparently Yoshi's Island doesn't "count" enough as a Mario game to even be considered for such a thing like this.
Big boobs are nice but they can be such a pain as well.Speaking from experience?
Considering the Super Famicom version of Super Mario Collection still fetches about 40-50 USD USED in Japan, this re-packaging + niceties selling for basically 25-30 bucks is actually a "deal" in many ways.It's still Nintendo making a quick and cheap buck with a game that will sell alot and porting stuff aside, likely took ZERO DEVELOPMENT TIME.
Besides, this collection is mainly for the Japanese public who got turned onto "Mario Mania" thanks to last year's NSMBW, but are largely unaware, or otherwise don't use the Virtual Console. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if NoA relegated this package (or just the game disc) as a Club Nintendo exclusive.
I remember.Scrooge still is the biggest badass in all of Disney when he is pictured right. I still have the stack of European comics from when I was a kid, and epic adventures are epic. Dude puts Indy to shame.
My favorite moment from that comic was Scrooge tearing the [tornado fang] down entire ship bare handed.
And it was just after he was humiliated by the pig guy, and he learned his mother passed away.
;___;
http://www.andriasang.com/e/blog/2010/09/13/mario_collection_images/...
Big boobs are not overrated.
You people.
I think big boobs are overrated.
...wat?Find me a song with more repetitions of its name in the chorus.
I know. You said "half the experience." I was being an ass and correcting you!Oh you.
Actually, the entire experience, and the only experience that matters, is about whether you enjoy the game or not, regardless of how good or how bad it looks or how well it plays or doesn't play. It's the same with movies or music.Personal taste and quality are two different things.
There's a rumor going around that all the major players in the Brightest Day biweekly are going to get their own series. Hawkman and Firestorm have my interest, Martian Manhunter and Deadman maybe, but I'll pass on Aquaman. I'm entirely sure why but Aquaman never appealed to me, all his supporting characters were far more enticing to me. Heck, Mera is the only reason why I'm following the Aquaman portions. That and Johns' writing with Reis' pencils.Aquaman can be quite cool when he wants to.
I played Dirt 2 for PSP. Physics were awful.Yeah, the PSP's GT was damn awful. Failing to understand that GT's main thing was to have the very best graphics and physics, portraying reality for that time was the studio's downfall. You don't downgrade a series that's about realism.
I wouldn't count DiRT as Rally, but Off-Road Mixed Vehicles
The Physics are superb in WRC for PSP.
I don't know about the console version of Dirt 1 or 2.
WRC seems the be the standard for Rally now.
If you're looking for a console game...
http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps3/998000-wrc-fia-world-rally-championship/data
As for PSP, don't get GT. It's soul crushingly boring.
GranTurismo(PSP)
Is this even a game?
Fun: 3
Seriousness: 9
Physics: 9
DiRT 2(PSP)
Tries to be serious, but physics ruin it.
Fun: 7
Seriousness: 8
Physics: 5
WRC(PSP)
Game with good physics based on a fun sport.
Fun: 9
Seriousness: 9
Physics: 9
Motorstorm(PSP)
Having fun for fun with a good engine.
Fun: 8
Seriousness: 5
Physics: 8
Wipeout(PSP)
Solid Future racer.
Fun: 8
Seriousness: 6
Physics: 6
Ford Off-Road(PSP)
Standard generic racing game
Fun: 6
Seriousness: 8
Physics: 7
Just because games with good graphics and bad gameplay are bad, doesn't mean that a game with good game play and bad graphics is good. Good graphics are good, good gameplay is good. From what we've seen, gameplay looks solid. It should not make us bad people to want graphics that match the gameplay's quality.Yes they do. They need to be good. Graphics need to be good because a game needs to look good. The visual aspect is half of the whole experience. Not just the gameplay, but what you SEE.
tl;dr
Graphics: Don't need to be good, but a game with bad graphics for no reason is unacceptable.


I think I get what you mean SB. For instance, 8-bit graphics are NOT bad. However, if MM9 and 10 had looked like the original donkey kong, that would have been bad.YES.
IMO Mega man Universe needs some AA and a few more polys to be considered a game with good graphics.